You can’t say that Trump didn’t warn us

By “us” I mean well connected GOP investors:

On the afternoon of Feb. 24, President Trump declared on Twitter that the coronavirus was “very much under control” in the United States, one of numerous rosy statements that he and his advisers made at the time about the worsening epidemic. He even added an observation for investors: “Stock market starting to look very good to me!”

But hours earlier, senior members of the president’s economic team, privately addressing board members of the conservative Hoover Institution, were less confident. Tomas J. Philipson, a senior economic adviser to the president, told the group he could not yet estimate the effects of the virus on the American economy. To some in the group, the implication was that an outbreak could prove worse than Mr. Philipson and other Trump administration advisers were signaling in public at the time.

The next day, board members — many of them Republican donors — got another taste of government uncertainty from Larry Kudlow, the director of the National Economic Council. Hours after he had boasted on CNBC that the virus was contained in the United States and “it’s pretty close to airtight,” Mr. Kudlow delivered a more ambiguous private message. He asserted that the virus was “contained in the U.S., to date, but now we just don’t know,”

. . .

To many of the investors who received or heard about the memo, it was the first significant sign of skepticism among Trump administration officials about their ability to contain the virus. It also provided a hint of the fallout that was to come, said one major investor who was briefed on it: the upending of daily life for the entire country.

“Short everything,” was the reaction of the investor, using the Wall Street term for betting on the idea that the stock prices of companies would soon fall.

Of course none of this is illegal:

[L]egal experts say . . . it is not apparent that any of the communications about the Hoover briefings violated securities laws. The Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission would have several hurdles to clear before establishing that Appaloosa or other funds that received insights from Mr. Callanan, either directly or through intermediaries, acted improperly.

In America, the SEC focuses on finding witches. For instance, just imagine how they’d react if I gave investment advice in the blog—such as my opinion on Tesla stock. I call this a “witch hunt” because there is no scientific evidence that registered investment advisors can pick stocks better than a monkey. But actual government corruption? Nothing to see here — move right along.

PS. I feel a bit less stupid about all my previous stupid posts on society’s increasing stupidity, now that Tyler has dipped his toe in the water. (Yes, I know, linking isn’t endorsement.)

PPS. Speaking of stupidity, this caught my eye:

You’re the president,” Guthrie said. “You’re not like someone’s crazy uncle 

Trump’s not like someone’s crazy uncle? What kind of drug was she taking?