The 3 Most Depressing Parts Of The Housing Crisis
|
In today’s Freshly Squeezed section, we link to some of our recent installments on housing. They help support a lot of what we’re riffing on today. The Juice tends to focus on the cost of home ownership. While we’ll do that a little bit today — because it’s important (and depressing) — we’ll also consider renting. Because things aren’t much better in the rental market. Right to it with what The Juice thinks are the three most depressing parts of the nation’s housing crisis. Home Ownership Is Impossible Of course, you have to start with this. It’s the most glaring and depressing part. Because it shoots to hell the old trajectory of
Even as mortgage interest rates started to come down, monthly payments remained massive. But, to make matters even more depressing, thanks to a stronger-than-expected economy and job market, mortgage interest rates have actually gone back up even after the Fed cuts. As we write this, the rate on the 30-year is 6.64%. Attach that to a $500,000 home and, after a $100,000 down payment (that’s 20% and also a lot of freaking money), you’re looking at a monthly payment of $3,232, including taxes and insurance. You need to earn considerably more than $10,000 a month to be able to afford that payment. |
Continued…
|
|
So, yeah, impossible.
If seeing home ownership become another privilege only the well-off can afford isn’t depressing, we don’t know what is. Renting Is Also Pretty Expensive Okay, fine. There’s nothing wrong with a nation of renters. Especially if they’re making decent money and either prefer renting or can live comfortably while falling just shy of becoming a homeowner. But, renting isn’t cheap either. And renters aren’t having a great time right now.
Keep that in mind. To afford the typical apartment, you need to earn close to six figures. That’s tough.
How Housing Can Impact Retirement (Or Working In Old Age) So, yeah, it’s depressing. You need to earn about $100,000 to not spend more than 30% of your income on housing. But, it gets even crazier, when you combine the first two depressing points and look ahead. Consider what is a scenario more common than we’d like to believe:
What happens when you turn 55, 60, 65, 70, 75 and you have a $2,000 or $3,000 or more thousand dollars a month rent payment? What happens if that eats up a considerable chunk of your Social Security payment, which, ideally, you don’t want to take at age 62? What happens before you turn 62? What if because of the high cost of rent all those years and your inability to buy (and pay off) a home, you were unable to save enough money for retirement to work in concert with Social Security? These are all very depressing what happens, what ifs and — let’s face it — hard realities of the housing crisis we’re facing and, as a nation, choosing to ignore. The Bottom Line: This is the thing about home ownership. It’s not necessarily the end all and be all. But, if you can do it when you’re relatively young and not break your back financially in the process, you make your prospects for retirement brighter. Ideally, you go into retirement with no or a very low housing payment. But you can’t do this if you can’t afford to buy a home or if you’re stuck with a high rent payment (that keeps going up) basically for life. Are we overreacting? Obviously, we don’t think so. Please feel free to share your perspective using the feedback link at the bottom of the page. How are you — or your kids, other family members, friends — navigating not only this housing market, but considering your prospects for life in your 50s, 60s and beyond? |
Proprietary Data Insights Top Residential REIT Searches This Month
|
News & Insights |
Freshly Squeezed
|
Want to get content like this directly to your inbox? |